Should art be beautiful essay
But I would like to reposition aesthetes as radical, transgressive figures, who challenged the very foundations of the conservative culture in which they lived, though an all-consuming love of beautiful things.
I do not wonder that Newton, with an attention habitually engaged on the paths of planets and suns, should have wondered what the Earl of Pembroke found to admire in "stone dolls.
It is therefore beautiful, because it is alive, moving, reproductive; it is therefore useful, because it is symmetrical and fair. On closer inspection I saw that it was a moveable wall, not a piece of art.
I think that's the audience people are implicitly talking about when they say a work of art is good: they mean it would engage any human.
I was to see and acquire I knew not what.
I would add that artists can at times engage in activism in order to grapple with intrinsically artistic questions.
The aesthete as radical The aesthete — a much maligned figure of lateth and earlyth century provides a fascinating insight on this topic.
This porcelain was the material embodiment of France as an advanced and flourishing nation. Beauty can be found in a snowy mountain scene: art is the photograph of it shown to family, the oil interpretation of it hung in a gallery, or the music score recreating the scene in crotchets and quavers.
So it turns out you can pick out some people and say that they have better taste than others: they're the ones who actually taste art like apples.
What is art philosophy
It was as if someone had brought up the topic of lung cancer in a meeting within Philip Morris. The infant lies in a pleasing trance, but his individual character and his practical power depend on his daily progress in the separation of things, and dealing with one at a time. Art is supposed to be the expression of feelings, the visual representation of what the artists is feeling or trying to show. Would it not be better to begin higher up, — to serve the ideal before they eat and drink; to serve the ideal in eating and drinking, in drawing the breath, and in the functions of life? If art can be anything to anybody at anytime, then there ends the discussion. We may say that aesthetics is both the study of aesthetic objects and of the specific and subjective reactions of observers, readers, or audiences to the work of art. Artwork that is not pleasant can help educate people on the other part of humanity that we are not so familiar with. Photography has no objection to beauty. Escher drawing, I am often emotionally inspired by the moment and intellectually stimulated by the thought-process that follows. Thus in the seventies, Howardena Pindell b. Some of these artworks may not be acceptable for some age groups, but this is no reason to close it down, or even challenge the museum with an eviction. Sufficiency for something to be art requires significance to art appreciators which endures as long as tokens or types of the artwork persist.
based on 116 review