College athletes should not be paid
College athletes should not be paid quotes
Many college athletes argue that since they do not have time to get jobs that they should be paid by the university so that they can have extra money to spend. Paying college athletes for their participation in sports eliminates the need for them to find outside employment to support themselves. Finding a balance, using key points like these, is the only way progress on this issue will be obtained. Most become professionals in their chosen field of study. A volleyball player at a small college could seek compensation like anyone else, but negligible revenue would make such a request moot. An additionally college degree allows a student to earn more money that one would make with an ordinary high school diploma whether the student get a professional job or not. It is a big topic now days in the world of sports on weather college athletes should be getting paid to play sports. It will hang on to its windfall tenaciously. It would make them seem like they are the most important people at the school. This is another job opportunity for an athlete. The biggest reason why college athletes should not be paid is that having a scholarship is technically a form of pay. Most Read.
People go to universities to improve their skills and learn how to perform their jobs better. She is also a member of Penn women's tennis. Surely this perspective is backward.
Reasons why college athletes should not be paid scholarly articles
College sports like basketball and football generate over six billion Should College Athletes Be Paid? Some are calling him the next LeBron James. These students would kill to have their school paid for and all they would have to worry about is their grades. Most fans of college sports do not know that the NCAA allows for additional help to athletes through the student athlete opportunity fund. Athletes work very hard to bring revenue to the university yet they are not rewarded monetary value. College athletics have gained great popularity of the past few decades, and have brought schools lots of revenue. Money would separate the athletes from the student body. A school's boosters club is made up of alumni that give a lot of money to the school. Do you find his argument persuasive? It is hard to be disciplined when you are getting paid a lot of money. Personally, tennis has been my life since I was three years old. Paying college athletes for their participation in sports eliminates the need for them to find outside employment to support themselves. Therefore, the question should never be about how much money the game is worth. The signing of contracts declares they are now playing for their university rather than individual. Until , the NCAA asserted a sole power to license each college football broadcast.
Dawn Staley, the South Carolina women's basketball coach grew up in the Philadelphia projects. It could create issues of paycheck equality. To consolidate his position as a top draft pick, Williamson needed Duke.
Living the Dream College athlete should realize that it is a privilege to get certain opportunity that most of their age mate aspire to have. Those who usually debate against paying college athletes say it would change the nature of college athletics.
That would degrade the quality of life available on-campus at many institutions. Many schools use the funds from their athletics programs to fund other programs and activities. If a student knows they will not go pro, they may decide to give up sports instead, which would ultimately reduce the income generated by collegiate sporting activities.
It is a big topic now days in the world of sports on weather college athletes should be getting paid to play sports.
based on 7 review